Francesca, thanks for your review. Pascal, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Best, Alissa > On Feb 3, 2020, at 2:40 AM, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini=40ericsson.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Looks good Pascal. Thanks for your quick update! > > Francesca > > On 31/01/2020, 10:55, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Francesca: > > Many thanks for your review : ) > > >> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication. However, I noticed the >> normative reference to an informative document, draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan- >> virtual-reassembly (ref. 'LWIG-VRB'), which is problematic, since this draft is >> on the standard track. > > Moved both this and the reference to recoverable frags to informational. They are just illustrative anyway. > >> >> Major issues: - >> >> Minor issues: - >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> * Last paragraph of Section 5, I suggest a minor reformulation for clarity. >> >> OLD: >> An associated >> caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >> fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >> a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment. >> NEW: >> An associated >> caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >> fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >> a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment from node >> A. >> > > Applied, and published 09. Please let me know if we are all set now? > > > Again, many thanks, Francesca! > > Pascal > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
