Looks good Pascal. Thanks for your quick update!
Francesca
On 31/01/2020, 10:55, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Francesca:
Many thanks for your review : )
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication. However, I noticed the
> normative reference to an informative document, draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan-
> virtual-reassembly (ref. 'LWIG-VRB'), which is problematic, since this draft is
> on the standard track.
Moved both this and the reference to recoverable frags to informational. They are just illustrative anyway.
>
> Major issues: -
>
> Minor issues: -
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> * Last paragraph of Section 5, I suggest a minor reformulation for clarity.
>
> OLD:
> An associated
> caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next
> fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to
> a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment.
> NEW:
> An associated
> caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next
> fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to
> a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment from node
> A.
>
Applied, and published 09. Please let me know if we are all set now?
Again, many thanks, Francesca!
Pascal
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
