On 28 Feb 2020, at 0:09, John C Klensin wrote:
I was just trying to suggest to Pete that, _if_ the IESG reaches some sort of conclusion and that conclusion were to include either agreement that there is an interaction or that the document action being appealed is about a problem that your document might lead us into more of, it might be wise to block out a bit more time for discussion than might otherwise be the case.
Taken under advisement. Our agenda is still pretty light, so we should have time to spare should this become an issue.
pr -- Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ All connections to the world are tenuous at best
