On 2/20/20 7:46 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
I think that we should pick the top 12-16 locations that participants are from, then for each destination prior to it being considered we calculate the travel PAIN (cost + time) for that set of participants.
Why favor participants from large cities? It's not like they're
representative of the whole group.
Also, different participants have different ideas of pain.
A fairer method would be to poll every participant about their
preferences for future meeting cities, then for each meeting, pick N
polled participants at random from those who have attended the last M
meetings (locally or remotely), and select from the cities show up in
their preference lists.
Keith
