On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 8:52 PM Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 27/2/20 20:58, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
[...]
>
> We need to ask ourselves what is more important ... quality of data
> plane for end users with 10s of ms of connectivity restoration times
> upon failure or keeping original IPv6 dogmas in place where folks never
> envisioned such needs or technologies to be invented.
I don't care myself about dogmas.
But there's an established process to do these things:
* You propose to change the existing behavior, and normally explain
what's that beneficial, and maybe you elaborate on why you are not
pursuing any possible alternatives.
* Once you gain consensus on the changes, you apply them.
That was the OSI model.
The Internet was based on a model of permisive experimentation.
The IETF is a catalyst for generating the necessary critical mass for deployment. But some deployments don't need a catalyst.
