Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/2/20 19:52, Joe Touch wrote:
FWIW - there are separable issues here:

- whether an IP header (or parts thereof) should be changed in transit

AFAICT, the answer has always been yes, but limited to the hopcount/ttl in the base header and hop-by-hop options in the options/extension headers.

- whether an IP header length can change in transit

I see no reason why it can't become smaller, but if it can become larger then PMTUD and PLPMTUD don't work.

Besides AH (which obviously breaks), hosts typically try to validate that the error messages they receive correspond to something they actually sent.

EH removal breaks that.

--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux