Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/2/20 20:04, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Joe, all,

Just to clarify something Fernando purposely missed in his call for action: >
All operations on the packets discussed in SPRING WG are happening NOT on the original (end to end) packet header. They are all defined to happen within new imposed outer encapsulated header (IPv6 in IPv6 to be precise).

Nobody ever claimed something different.

But I tell you what: the outer packets are IPv6 packets. Hence, when you add/remove extension headers en-route to destination, you are violating RFC8200.

Please repeat with me: IPv6 does not allow the insertion/removal of extension header while the packets are en-route to the final destination.

I wished this conversation could go back to a honest one.

Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux