Reviewer: Vincent Roca Review result: Has Nits Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Has Nits Thank you for the clarification of the Security Considerations section. I just have a minor comment and a typo. - It is said (section 6): "The CMD SHOULD use a pacing approach to limit this amplification risk." I agree, but where do you intend to apply pacing? In the incoming queue (i.e., by delaying some PBU/PBA messages) or in the outgoing queue (i.e., to limit output traffic), or both? It's a bit unclear. - Typo: remove one "exist" in sentence: "there may exist multiple previous (e.g., k) MAARs exist." Regards, Vincent -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
