Tim, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot and pointed to your review. Alissa > On Oct 2, 2019, at 5:09 PM, Tim Evens via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Tim Evens > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-12 > Reviewer: Tim Evens > Review Date: 2019-10-02 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-03 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Under section 1.4, BPA is referenced in bullet 1 and 2 but is first defined in > bullet 4. Suggest defining that in bullet 1. > > On page 10: > > * "never used to sign the cipher- text provided" has an extra space between > cipher- and text. > > * "The BCB is decrypted by security- aware nodes in the" has an extra space > between security- and aware. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
