Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My point: These blanket travel bans are NOT “government imposed,” but rather a matter of *corporate* policy in many cases.

Ole J.. Jacobsen
Editor & Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Cell: +1 415 370-4628
T-Mobile: +1 415 889-9821
Docomo: +81 90 3337 9311‬
http://protocoljournal.org

Sent from my iPhone

On 17 Feb 2020, at 07:16, Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes.  A blanket travel ban is a government imposed travel restriction and so we will provide a full refund in that instance.  To confirm, the list of possible government imposed travel restrictions now includes (but is not limited to):

- denial of exit
- denial of entry
- diversion
- repatriation
- isolation
- quarantine.
- blanket travel bans

Jay


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor & Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Cell: +1 415 370-4628
T-Mobile: +1 415 889-9821
Docomo: +81 90 3337 9311‬

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 Feb 2020, at 14:57, Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Just in case anyone is confused by this, the recently announced policy is for a full refund in the case of *any* government imposed travel restrictions that prevent someone attending the meeting, which may include, but are not limited to, denial of exit, denial of entry, diversion, repatriation, isolation and quarantine.

Jay

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@xxxxxxxx

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@xxxxxxxx
+64 21 678840


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux