On Wed, 26 Feb 2020, tom petch wrote:
It asks that the original assignee and contact be preserved as a Note; I disagree - I think that they should be in columns entitled Original Assignee or some such and that the IANA registry be updated with a reference to this I-D as an RFC so as to see what happened.
I'm not sure it matters much what the column is called where this historic information resides.
It calls for action if the e-mail address is not valid. What does this mean? It needs to be more specific, such as there is no MTA for the domain, or the MTA says that there is no such local part.
I'm not sure why these emails are that important. I think the emails are more or less a courtesy to the original assignment holders. With that responsibility moving back to the IESG, why would we require a response at all? Paul -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
