>> I don't think it's accurate to say: "almost nobody started using ipv6" Yes it is inaccurate, but I say this from my experience and my point of view. But even the percentage shown in the mentioned website doesn't makes us optimistic, because it took long time and we didn't feel any problem during that time because IPv4 was still available, but now after the depletion, the problem will start to be clear and visible for all. Regards, Khaled Omar -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:51 PM To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence. On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:28 AM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From what I see in the real world, IPv4 still dominating and almost nobody started using IPv6, and also, I didn’t find any solution applied practically in today’s networks for this issue. > I don't think it's accurate to say: "almost nobody started using ipv6" https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/2018/state-of-ipv6-deployment-2018/ these numbers are ~2yrs old... but 25% is not "almost nobody".
