Re: SE Asia is painful for many, why has it become a preferred destination?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

ICN, NRT are also much easier from the west coast than SIN or BKK.

LL

> On Feb 16, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Christian Hopps <chopps@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I've read the mtgvenue drafts and they seem to indicate that travel pain should be minimized as much as possible.
> 
> With IETF 109 we will have chosen SE Asia as a destination for the Asia part of 1-1-1 policy for 4 years running. Also troubling there's a pattern of SIN BKK SIN BKK developing.
> 
> The *fastest* flights I can find to BKK involve 24h hours of air travel (airplanes and too short layovers for this type of travel). It is incredibly painful to spend 24-30 hours  in airplanes and airports. At least for me (A non-west coast NA based participant) SE Asia is maximizing pain.
> 
> Japan and Korea both seems to be 1/3 less travel for much of NA, and also seemingly no worse or not as bad for much of Europe.
> 
> Could the powers that be please consider changing the SIN,BKK,SIN,... pattern to NRT,ICN,NRT,... or at *minimum* mixing more NRT or ICN in there?
> 
> I think this would benefit a large percentage of IETF participants w/o adding undue pain elsewhere.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux