Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.
This draft specifies an IANA registry for the Location-to-Service Translation
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.
This draft specifies an IANA registry for the Location-to-Service Translation
(LoST) Protocol Validation Service Tag under U-NAPTR.
The security considerations section does exist and refers to RFC 3958 and 4848.
The security considerations section does exist and refers to RFC 3958 and 4848.
I agree that this change does not introduce any new security considerations.
General comments:
None.
Editorial comments:
None.
Editorial comments:
Abbreviations should be expanded in the title of the draft and when first used (in this case the Abstract).
s/...//
Shawn.
--
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
