On 4 Mar 2020, at 18:41, Shawn Emery wrote:
Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.
This draft specifies an IANA registry for the Location-to-Service
Translation
(LoST) Protocol Validation Service Tag under U-NAPTR.
The security considerations section does exist and refers to RFC 3958
and
4848.
I agree that this change does not introduce any new security
considerations.
General comments:
None.
Editorial comments:
Abbreviations should be expanded in the title of the draft and when
first
used (in this case the Abstract).
s/...//
Shawn.
--
Thanks for your review, Shawn. Just to clarify, your suggestion is that
"S-NAPTR" be expanded in the Abstract, e.g., by adding "(Straightforward
Name Authority PoinTeR)".
--Randall
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
