Sean Turner <sean@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > BTW - I spun a new version to make the changes I noted early (at the > request of Roman) I will read the new version and go from there. I realize that this I-D is just a modification of a previous RFC and as such there isn't a requirement that it be fully comprehensible on its own. However, I'm sensitive to terminology, and I want to ensure that even if reading the document alone does not fully inform the reader, it should not cause them to believe incorrect things because the terminology does not properly reflect the reality. Dale -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
