"could" is fine by me. I was pointing out the potential confusion, but I'm not committed to my particular text proposal.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:09 AM Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ian Swett via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> schrieb am 02.03.2020 um 17:47 in
Nachricht
<25708_1583167660_5E5D38AC_25708_855_1_158316762892.27374.16780761185123723332@i
tfa.amsl.com>:
[...]
> Section 9, Security Considerations
>
> The sentence beginning with "Timestamps can be spoofed or modified..."
> implies
What about a simple "could" instead of "can"? Actually I see no problem with the original sentence as long it doesn't read "Timestamps are spoofed and modified..."
[...]
Regards,
Ulrich
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
