Not sure if there is a better list for the corona discussions than ietf@xxxxxxxx, 107attendees wouldn't really do it i think. But maybe we can at least separate out those discussions from the ones about what the IETF should continue to do (planning beyonf cancellation). Interesting data point, Mikael. I would have thought it to be exactly the other way around given how summer supposedly creates infection dips, and summer is usually dryer. Toerless On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > > > Someone send me a private email (suggested to send to the list) that > > effectively shows that the virus is not resistent to heat, so as much as > > we move towards spring/summer, less chances to propagate. Of course, we > > should not ask to have the meeting rooms freezing! > > There is also humidity factor > > https://www.livescience.com/27533-flu-transmission-humidity.html > > "At humidity levels of 23 percent, 70 to 77 percent of the flu virus > particles were still able to cause an infection an hour after the coughing > simulation. But when humidity levels were raised to 43 percent, just 14 > percent of the virus particles had the ability to infect. Most of the flu > particles became inactive 15 minutes after they were released into the humid > air. "The virus just falls apart," at high humidity levels, said study > researcher John Noti, of the CDC's National Institute for Occupational > Safety and Health." > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
