Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> being able to go up to the person afterwards
>> and chat is the reason it works in person. That fails for remote presenters,
>> and for remote audience, and therefore Youtube would be as good.
> But that is entirely a tools limitation, or actually a limitation in
> the way we use our tools.
> It would be easy to have hallway rooms (e.g. in meet.jit.si) open for
> each presentation after the presentation. Linked from the hotrfc
> agenda (which could also be made easier to find), so they are one click
> away.
> Yes, that would require local presenters to stay close to their laptops
> a bit.
We should probably give each presenter a stable URN for this room, so that
they can publish this during their presentation, and we'll need to have a
queue system for asynchronous questions.
I know, let's call it: Sunday Meeting Talk-later Protocol. SMTP.
Is that taken?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
