Fedora Legal - Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: An old legal opinion seems to have been forgotten
- Re: An old legal opinion seems to have been forgotten
- Re: An old legal opinion seems to have been forgotten
- An old legal opinion seems to have been forgotten
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- From: Justin W. Flory (he/him)
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
- Re: How to name the license in the spec
- From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
- How to name the license in the spec
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: NTP license
- Re: NTP license
- NTP license
- Re: CNEWS license
- Re: CNEWS license
- From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
- Re: CNEWS license
- From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
- Re: CNEWS license
- Re: CNEWS license
- CNEWS license
- From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
- Re: QPL with exception
- Re: QPL with exception
- QPL with exception
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: joke license (McRae General Public License)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: Spot's RH mail on legal wiki page
- Spot's RH mail on legal wiki page
- Fwd: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- ASL 2.0 with exceptions
- Re: joke license (McRae General Public License)
- From: Justin W. Flory (he/him)
- Re: joke license (McRae General Public License)
- Re: joke license (McRae General Public License)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: License of libevent's ax_prog_doxygen.m4
- Re: License of libevent's ax_prog_doxygen.m4
- Re: License of libevent's ax_prog_doxygen.m4
- License of libevent's ax_prog_doxygen.m4
- Re: Is BSD-2-Clause with addition clause allowed?
- Re: Please give your advice in bug 1801519
- Re: Is BSD-2-Clause with addition clause allowed?
- Re: Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- Re: Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- Re: Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- Re: Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- Re: Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- Determining minimum package review requirements relating to licenses
- Re: joke license (McRae General Public License)
- joke license (McRae General Public License)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Please give your advice in bug 1801519
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- Is BSD-2-Clause with addition clause allowed?
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- Re: FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
- Please give your advice in bug 1801519
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Question about license of Geant4 and its datasets
- Question about license of Geant4 and its datasets
- Re: Licensing Violation by iControlOne and ADT
- Re: Packaging firmwares
- Re: Packaging firmwares
- Re: Packaging firmwares
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Packaging firmwares
- Re: Packaging firmwares
- Re: Packaging firmwares
- Packaging firmwares
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Licensing Violation by iControlOne and ADT
- Re: License of Go/Rust or any statically linked packages
- Re: License of Go/Rust or any statically linked packages
- Re: License of Go/Rust or any statically linked packages
- License of Go/Rust or any statically linked packages
- Licensing Violation by iControlOne and ADT
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
- Re: EUPL v1.2
- From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
- EUPL v1.2
- From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
- Re: A non-vanilla GPLv3+ license question
- A non-vanilla GPLv3+ license question
- Re: Packaging exfatprogs for Fedora
- Packaging exfatprogs for Fedora
- Re: Legal blockers regarding WSL release?
- Re: Legal blockers regarding WSL release?
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: FSL license
- Re: Legal blockers regarding WSL release?
- Re: Legal blockers regarding WSL release?
- Re: FSL license
- Re: Legal blockers regarding WSL release?
- Legal blockers regarding WSL release?
- FSL license
- Re: Partio license
- Re: Partio license
- Partio license
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Lua Logo license text (restricted modifications)
- Re: License list synchronization for rpminspect
- Re: License list synchronization for rpminspect
- License list synchronization for rpminspect
- Re: Open CASCADE Technology licence for versions 6.7.0 and later.
- Re: Open CASCADE Technology licence for versions 6.7.0 and later.
- Re: Open CASCADE Technology licence for versions 6.7.0 and later.
- Re: Open CASCADE Technology licence for versions 6.7.0 and later.
- Re: Open CASCADE Technology licence for versions 6.7.0 and later.
- Open CASCADE Technology licence for versions 6.7.0 and later.
- List of formats that have been examined for patent expiration?
- Re: fedoraproject.org in XML namespace name
- Re: fedoraproject.org in XML namespace name
- Re: fedoraproject.org in XML namespace name
- Re: fedoraproject.org in XML namespace name
- Re: fedoraproject.org in XML namespace name
- Re: Volatility Software License
- Re: Volatility Software License
- Re: GPLv3 and PHP License
- Re: GPLv3 and PHP License
- Re: GPLv3 and PHP License
- Re: GPLv3 and PHP License
- Re: GPLv3 and PHP License
- GPLv3 and PHP License
- Re: fedoraproject.org in XML namespace name
- fedoraproject.org in XML namespace name
- erlang-jose license change
- How to write License field for packages bundling mutliple others
- Re: How to write License field for packages bundling mutliple others
- Re: Broken link to zip license
- Re: Broken link to zip license
- Re: Fedora 31 licensing information
- [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: Data licence Germany – attribution – version 2.0
- Re: Licensing translations provided via Zanata (and now Weblate)
- From: Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
- Re: Licensing translations provided via Zanata (and now Weblate)
- [Fedora-legal-list] Data licence Germany – attribution – version 2.0
- From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
- Re: Licensing translations provided via Zanata (and now Weblate)
- Licensing translations provided via Zanata (and now Weblate)
- Re: Is Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 ok for code?
- Is Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 ok for code?
- Re: 0BSD license
- Re: 0BSD license
- License field on statically compiled executable
- 0BSD license
- Re: Adding svt-hevc package to Fedora
- Volatility Software License
- Fedora, Export-Regulations and Fedorians in Venezuela
- Re: swap-ware
- Re: swap-ware
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: swap-ware
- Re: swap-ware
- Re: swap-ware
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: swap-ware
- Re: derivative of the MPEG Software Simulation Group's MPEG-2 reference code
- swap-ware
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- derivative of the MPEG Software Simulation Group's MPEG-2 reference code
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Licensing of the bundled libraries
- Adding svt-hevc package to Fedora
- Broken link to zip license
- Re: License specified as "Free Art 1.0", no license text
- Re: License specified as "Free Art 1.0", no license text
- Re: License specified as "Free Art 1.0", no license text
- Re: License specified as "Free Art 1.0", no license text
- From: Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
- License specified as "Free Art 1.0", no license text
- Re: Patent question for davs2 - An open-source decoder of AVS2-P2/IEEE1857.4 video coding
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Specifically approved license for Copr: Netperf
- Re: Specifically approved license for Copr: Netperf
- Re: Specifically approved license for Copr: Netperf
- Specifically approved license for Copr: Netperf
- Re: Patent question for davs2 - An open-source decoder of AVS2-P2/IEEE1857.4 video coding
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Patent question for davs2 - An open-source decoder of AVS2-P2/IEEE1857.4 video coding
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Regarding GPL compatibility of fdk-aac
- Re: Adding openhantek to fedora repo
- Re: Adding openhantek to fedora repo
- Re: Adding openhantek to fedora repo
- Re: Adding openhantek to fedora repo
- License mix of package "anki"
- Adding openhantek to fedora repo
- Re: Public Domain - preferred wording for "license"?
- Re: Public Domain - preferred wording for "license"?
- Re: Public Domain - preferred wording for "license"?
- Re: Public Domain - preferred wording for "license"?
- Public Domain - preferred wording for "license"?
- Analog Devices License
- Re: The JSON License
- The JSON License
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Licenses for AGG
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- terms and conditions
- From: Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
- Re: Eclipse trademark policy
- Eclipse trademark policy
- Re: Expat
- Re: Expat
- Expat
- Re: MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video
- New OpenSSH with post-quantum NTRU algorithm
- Re: BSD-2-Clause
- Re: BSD-2-Clause
- Re: BSD-2-Clause
- Re: BSD-2-Clause
- Re: python-pillow license - MIT? something else?
- Re: python-pillow license - MIT? something else?
- python-pillow license - MIT? something else?
- Re: Use of xml tools
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- Re: BSD-2-Clause
- Re: BSD-2-Clause
- Re: BSD-2-Clause
- BSD-2-Clause
- Re: Lucent Public License (LPL) and GPL compatibility
- Lucent Public License (LPL) and GPL compatibility
- From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
- Re: Broken link to NCSA license
- Broken link to NCSA license
- Re: transgrp license
- Re: Fwd: proj datumgrid licenses
- Fwd: proj datumgrid licenses
- From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
- Re: transgrp license
- Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal
- Re: transgrp license
- Re: transgrp license
- Re: transgrp license
- Re: transgrp license
- Re: transgrp license
- transgrp license
- Re: Can we please stop enforcing Signed-off-by commits?
- Re: Can we please stop enforcing Signed-off-by commits?
- Re: Can we please stop enforcing Signed-off-by commits?
- Re: Mbrola voice files
- Re: Mbrola voice files
- Re: Mbrola voice files
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Mbrola voice files
- Mbrola voice files
- Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1
- Re: Decompilers allowed
- Re: Decompilers allowed
- Decompilers allowed
- Re: allowed content in copr
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: allowed content in copr
- Re: allowed content in copr
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: allowed content in copr
- Re: allowed content in copr
- allowed content in copr
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Opinion on PATENTS clause in bug 1652305
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Ubuntu font license
- Fwd: CC-BY-SA-4.0
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Ubuntu font license
- Ubuntu font license
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FDK-AAC license LGPL compatibility
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Universal Public License
- Universal Public License
- FDK-AAC license LGPL compatibility
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- Ruby license
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)
- Re: Microsoft & OIN - ExFAT, subpixel font rendering (ClearType), etc. allowed now
- Re: Microsoft & OIN - ExFAT, subpixel font rendering (ClearType), etc. allowed now
- Re: Server Side Public License, Version 1 (SSPL v1)
- Re: Server Side Public License, Version 1 (SSPL v1)
- Re: Server Side Public License, Version 1 (SSPL v1)
- Server Side Public License, Version 1 (SSPL v1)
- Re: Logging IRC channels and GPDR
- Re: Logging IRC channels and GPDR
- Re: Logging IRC channels and GPDR
- Logging IRC channels and GPDR
- Re: Microsoft & OIN - ExFAT, subpixel font rendering (ClearType), etc. allowed now
- Re: Microsoft & OIN - ExFAT, subpixel font rendering (ClearType), etc. allowed now
- Re: Microsoft & OIN - ExFAT, subpixel font rendering (ClearType), etc. allowed now
- Re: Microsoft & OIN - ExFAT, subpixel font rendering (ClearType), etc. allowed now
- Microsoft & OIN - ExFAT, subpixel font rendering (ClearType), etc. allowed now
- Re: Higan in Copr
- Higan in Copr
- Re: SoftFloat-COPYING is legal ?
- Re: SoftFloat-COPYING is legal ?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- SoftFloat-COPYING is legal ?
- questions about licensing for GZDoom and Quakespasm?
- From: Victor Hugo Aguiar Pacce
- Fedora firmware exception and GPL violations
- Re: Policy for test suites with 'Bad Licenses'
- Policy for test suites with 'Bad Licenses'
- Permission notice and disclaimer variant
- Re: Another permission notice variant
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: Adding package with binary firmware to repo
- Re: Adding package with binary firmware to repo
- Re: Adding package with binary firmware to repo
- Re: Adding package with binary firmware to repo
- Adding package with binary firmware to repo
- Re: Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- License field in fribidi package
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: Inner Net License/radvd BSD variant: Still BSD?
- Re: Inner Net License/radvd BSD variant: Still BSD?
- Re: Another permission notice variant
- Re: Inner Net License/radvd BSD variant: Still BSD?
- Re: Another permission notice variant
- Another permission notice variant
- Inner Net License/radvd BSD variant: Still BSD?
- Re: Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- Re: Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- Re: Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- Re: Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- Re: Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- Software whose only purpose is to breach web site terms of service
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: NTP license question
- Re: Are we OK with EPL-2.0 ?
- Are we OK with EPL-2.0 ?
- NTP license question
- Re: netperf license: suitable for Fedora?
- Re: netperf license: suitable for Fedora?
- Re: netperf license: suitable for Fedora?
- Re: netperf license: suitable for Fedora?
- netperf license: suitable for Fedora?
- Re: CDDL in system library
- Re: CDDL in system library
- Re: CDDL in system library
- CDDL in system library
- Re: Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page
- Privacy policy change
- Re: question about wxWindows Library Licence
- Re: NIST license
- NIST license
- Re: Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page
- Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page
- question about wxWindows Library Licence
- libmml LGPLv2 with exception license
- Re: Don't Be a Dick Public License
- Re: Don't Be a Dick Public License
- Re: Don't Be a Dick Public License
- Don't Be a Dick Public License
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: European General Data Protection Regulation
- European General Data Protection Regulation
- Re: George Douros' fonts can no longer be packaged in Fedora
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: George Douros' fonts can no longer be packaged in Fedora
- George Douros' fonts can no longer be packaged in Fedora
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG
- From: Abhiram Kuchibhotla
- Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG
- Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG
- Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG
- Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG
- From: Abhiram Kuchibhotla
- Re: Paintown asssets
- Re: Paintown asssets
- Paintown asssets
- Re: 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store
- Re: 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store
- Re: 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store
- 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store
- Re: Nagios Open Software License: free software?
- Re: FSF All Permissive License for AppStream Metadata
- Re: FSF All Permissive License for AppStream Metadata
- FSF All Permissive License for AppStream Metadata
- Re: CP/M license
- Re: CP/M license
- Re: CP/M license
- Re: CP/M license
- CP/M license
- Re: No activity on bug blocking FE-Legal
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: No activity on bug blocking FE-Legal
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- No activity on bug blocking FE-Legal
- Re: Nagios Open Software License: free software?
- Re: Nagios Open Software License: free software?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Nagios Open Software License: free software?
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th!
- Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th!
- Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th!
- Re: Forbidden_items is not updated ?
- Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th!
- Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th!
- Forbidden_items is not updated ?
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- BSD 2-Clause license
- MPEG-LA statement about the last MPEG-2 patent expiration in US (February 13, 2018)
- Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th!
- Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th!
- Re: Batch icon set license
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Re: Batch icon set license
- Batch icon set license
- Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ?
- Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ?
- Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ?
- Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ?
- Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ?
- twolame could we move it to Fedora ?
- [Fedora-legal-list] Re: COPR rules regarding ‘contrib’ (Was: libdvdcss package in COPR)
- COPR rules regarding ‘contrib’ (Was: libdvdcss package in COPR)
- Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ?
- Re: Ocaml documentation license
- Re: Ocaml documentation license
- Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ?
- Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ?
- Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ?
- Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ?
- Ocaml documentation license
- Re: [3dprinting] Relicensing Cura to LGPLv3+ (but is still uses AGPLv3+ and GPLv3)
- Re: [3dprinting] Relicensing Cura to LGPLv3+ (but is still uses AGPLv3+ and GPLv3)
- Relicensing Cura to LGPLv3+ (but is still uses AGPLv3+ and GPLv3)
- Re: Perfect DOS VGA 437 - is it okay to package this font?
- Perfect DOS VGA 437 - is it okay to package this font?
- Re: JpGraph and "open source use"
- EPL-2.0 license
- Re: JpGraph and "open source use"
- Re: Licensing wiki page for QPL has dead URL
- Licensing wiki page for QPL has dead URL
- JpGraph and "open source use"
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+
- Re: CUPS changing from GPLv2 to ASL2.0 -- implications?
- Re: Dealing with patented code included in tarballs
- Dealing with patented code included in tarballs
- Re: CUPS changing from GPLv2 to ASL2.0 -- implications?
- CUPS changing from GPLv2 to ASL2.0 -- implications?
- Re: CDDL 1.0 and 1.1
- Re: Antlr license
- Re: CDDL 1.0 and 1.1
- Re: Antlr license
- GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+
- Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+
- Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+
- Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+
- Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+
- Antlr license
- CDDL 1.0 and 1.1
- Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
- Re: Announcement: fdk-aac
- Re: Announcement: fdk-aac
- Announcement: fdk-aac
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- S3TC / libtxc_dxtn
- Re: libdvdcss package in COPR
- Re: libdvdcss package in COPR
- Re: libdvdcss package in COPR
- libdvdcss package in COPR
- Re: Pyramid and the Repoze license
- Re: Pyramid and the Repoze license
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Pyramid and the Repoze license
- What's the current MPEG-1 layer 2 (mp2) encoding status?
- Fedora Export Compliance/Customs Information
- Re: Bison license exception
- Re: Bison license exception
- Doubts about GPLv3+ with added clause
- Bison license exception
- Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ?
- Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ?
- Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ?
- Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ?
- about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ?
- Re: Eclipse licences for fonts
- Eclipse licences for fonts
- erlang-p1_pam license change: GPLv2 --> ASL 2.0
- Re: [3dprinting] License for data files about 3D printing materials
- Re: Difficulty about package license
- From: Charalampos Stratakis
- License for data files about 3D printing materials
- Re: Difficulty about package license
- Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
- Re: Difficulty about package license
- Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
- Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
- Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
- Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
- Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
- Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
- Re: Difficulty about package license
- Difficulty about package license
- Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git
- Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git
- Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git
- Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git
- Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git
- Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git
- Re: any blockers for mjpeg based applications?
- any blockers for mjpeg based applications?
- Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
- Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages
- Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages
- fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages
- Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
- Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
- Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
- Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
- Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
- Re: mp3 patents + encoding in Fedora
- vagrant-hostmanager-1.8.6 license change: MIT → MPLv2.0
- mp3 patents + encoding in Fedora
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Nil license
- Nil license
- Fedora patches License
- Re: BioPython license change
- BioPython license change
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Guidelines for publishing container images
- Re: Guidelines for publishing container images
- Guidelines for publishing container images
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: FPCA for pagure.io
- Re: c-pchart: GPL unless you wish to use it in a commercial project
- Re: c-pchart: GPL unless you wish to use it in a commercial project
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Re: FPCA for pagure.io
- FPCA for pagure.io (was: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?)
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- AC-3 support in Fedora
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- Re: Hack Open Font License
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Hack Open Font License
- Re: AC-3 in Fedora
- Re: AC-3 in Fedora
- AC-3 in Fedora
- Re: CLA from Intel
- Re: rhash license
- Re: rhash license
- rhash license
- Re: c-pchart: GPL unless you wish to use it in a commercial project
- Re: c-pchart: GPL unless you wish to use it in a commercial project
- c-pchart: GPL unless you wish to use it in a commercial project
- Small bitmap Nintendo logo in package
- Re: New github TOS
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- New github TOS
- Re: DO WHATEVER PUBLIC LICENSE
- From: Sanqui (David Labský)
- Re: SPDX license tags and Rust packaging
- Re: DO WHATEVER PUBLIC LICENSE
- Re: SPDX license tags and Rust packaging
- Re: DO WHATEVER PUBLIC LICENSE
- Re: DO WHATEVER PUBLIC LICENSE
- Re: DO WHATEVER PUBLIC LICENSE
- DO WHATEVER PUBLIC LICENSE
- SPDX license tags and Rust packaging
- Re: CLA from Intel
- Re: CLA from Intel
- CLA from Intel
- Re: Legal issue with netpbm
- Legal issue with netpbm
- Re: radare2: LGPLv3.0 with exception
- Re: radare2: LGPLv3.0 with exception
- Re: PointOne Public License
- Re: PointOne Public License
- PointOne Public License
- Re: NTP GPL
- Re: NTP GPL
- NTP GPL
- Re: License compatibility : MPLv2.0 and GPLv3+
- Re: Missing license header for ASL 2.0 project
- Re: Missing license header for ASL 2.0 project
- Missing license header for ASL 2.0 project
- License compatibility : MPLv2.0 and GPLv3+
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- Re: License of a file in espeak-ng
- License of a file in espeak-ng
- Un-retiring QCad
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: legal Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2
- Re: legal Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- MP3 status?
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Linux Kernel]