On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:44:03PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I have a wish.
I am an product owner of Copr service. Currently, you can build in
Copr only packages with the same good licenses as you can do in
Fedora.
However, in Copr we do not need to be as strict as Fedora. Fedora does
not allow license which are ok to redistribute, but you cannot modify
it.
Do we have some example of license which is:
* forbidden in Fedora,
* the only reason for that is that it does not allow modification?
Can we have at least one such license allowed for Copr?
Copr performing a build and publishing the built artifact still
constitutes "distributing" in the same manner as we build and
distribute Fedora, right? If that is the case, I imagine we should
not have an exception for Copr.
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
