On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 3:44 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have a wish. > > I am an product owner of Copr service. Currently, you can build in Copr only packages with the same good licenses as you > can do in Fedora. > > However, in Copr we do not need to be as strict as Fedora. Fedora does not allow license which are ok to redistribute, > but you cannot modify it. > > Do we have some example of license which is: > * forbidden in Fedora, > * the only reason for that is that it does not allow modification? > > Can we have at least one such license allowed for Copr? Is there a specific reason why this is needed? It doesn't sound like there is some upstream software already under such a license that someone wants to build in Copr. Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
