Fedora Legal - Date Index

• Thread Index

• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 224 packages remaining
  • From: Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches
  • From: Alexey Lunev via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches
  • From: Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches
  • From: Alexey Lunev via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: License change between Unicode 15.0.0 and 15.1.0? Unicode-DFS-2016 vs. Unicode-3.0
  • From: Fabio Valentini via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: License change between Unicode 15.0.0 and 15.1.0? Unicode-DFS-2016 vs. Unicode-3.0
  • From: Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] License change between Unicode 15.0.0 and 15.1.0? Unicode-DFS-2016 vs. Unicode-3.0
  • From: Fabio Valentini via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 305 packages remaining
  • From: Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: SPDX tag for this Unicode source license
  • From: Peter Lemenkov via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: SPDX tag for this Unicode source license
  • From: Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] SPDX tag for this Unicode source license
  • From: Peter Lemenkov via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Fedora SPDX ID for CRC32 License
  • From: Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fedora SPDX ID for CRC32 License
  • From: Ian McInerney via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Licensing BIP derived files
  • From: Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Ian McInerney
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: tcplay generic_xts* file licenses
  • From: Ian McInerney
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: tcplay generic_xts* file licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] tcplay generic_xts* file licenses
  • From: Ian McInerney
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Björn Persson
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Fedora-legal-list] Licensing BIP derived files
  • From: Cristian Le
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Dealing with snippets credited to StackOverflow?
  • From: Omair Majid
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Dealing with snippets credited to StackOverflow?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Dealing with snippets credited to StackOverflow?
  • From: Ben Beasley
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-legal-list] Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Niki Lauda Edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: License acceptability check for py-sdl
  • From: Sandro
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: License acceptability check for py-sdl
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] License acceptability check for py-sdl
  • From: Sandro
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - House Sign Edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Michal Schorm
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Michal Schorm
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: OpenAL docs redistribution / modification?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Michal Schorm
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• [Fedora-legal-list] Review and Guidance needed - licenses transforming based on time
  • From: Michal Schorm
• [Fedora-legal-list] OpenAL docs redistribution / modification?
  • From: Marián Konček
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: David Cantrell
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: Gary Buhrmaster
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: David Cantrell
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: David Cantrell
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Update on Fedora treatment of Nmap licensing
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Alice Edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: EXIV2 BMFF Patents situation : we need an official answer
  • From: Neal Gompa
• EXIV2 BMFF Patents situation : we need an official answer
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• bmff and exiv2 update - can we have a clear reply?
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: GlobalProtect-openconnect - License violation or not?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: GlobalProtect-openconnect - License violation or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• GlobalProtect-openconnect - License violation or not?
  • From: Jakub Kadlcik
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Unicode licensing of finl_unicode
  • From: Cristian Le
• License for Sublime Text language definitions for syntax highlighting
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Human Space Flight edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Retiring celestia due to licensing issues
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Retiring celestia due to licensing issues
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
  • From: Giovanni Venturi
• Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Book Smugglers edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Trivy for licenses
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Trivy for licenses
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Trivy for licenses
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Trivy for licenses
  • From: Philippe Ombredanne
• Trivy for licenses
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Tim Flink
• License check for pyuca
  • From: Sandro
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Beginning of the year edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Question about public domain file in dictd
  • From: Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Question about public domain file in dictd
  • From: Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
• Re: Question about public domain file in dictd
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Question about public domain file in dictd
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Question about public domain file in dictd
  • From: Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• AI/ML Model and Pre-Trained Weight Packaging in Fedora
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: License review for package scummvm
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License review for package scummvm
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: License review for package scummvm
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Using the GPL as MPL Secondary license (Was: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license-tag purpose/goal (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: license-tag purpose/goal (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: License check
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: Using the GPL as MPL Secondary license (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: license-tag purpose/goal (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: License review for package scummvm
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License review for package scummvm
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License review for package scummvm
  • From: Richard Fontana
• License review for package scummvm
  • From: Christian Krause
• Re: License check
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: License check
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: License check
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License check
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: License check
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• License check
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: License for Throwable-SugarFactory
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: License for Throwable-SugarFactory
  • From: Petr Pisar
• License for Throwable-SugarFactory
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Selkirk edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: IBM non-free patent notice
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: golang-github-hashicorp-lru-arc-2 IBM patent issue
  • From: Philippe Ombredanne
• Re: golang-github-hashicorp-lru-arc-2 IBM patent issue
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: golang-github-hashicorp-lru-arc-2 IBM patent issue
  • From: Philippe Ombredanne
• golang-github-hashicorp-lru-arc-2 IBM patent issue
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Lisa edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: LicenseRef-Fedora-SourceLicenses (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: LicenseRef-Fedora-SourceLicenses (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: LicenseRef-Fedora-SourceLicenses (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: LicenseRef-Fedora-SourceLicenses (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: IBM non-free patent notice
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: IBM non-free patent notice (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: license-tag purpose/goal (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: license-tag purpose/goal (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: IBM non-free patent notice (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: When can license notices be removed or not (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Using the GPL as MPL Secondary license (Was: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license-tag purpose/goal (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: LicenseRef-Fedora-SourceLicenses (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Using the GPL as MPL Secondary license (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• When can license notices be removed or not (Was: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• IBM non-free patent notice (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: LicenseRef-Fedora-SourceLicenses (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• license-tag purpose/goal (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• LicenseRef-Fedora-SourceLicenses (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: Request additions to allowed licenses for Fedora (Multics & GAL).
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• Re: Request additions to allowed licenses for Fedora (Multics & GAL).
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Request additions to allowed licenses for Fedora (Multics & GAL).
  • From: Jeff Johnson
• [ANNOUNCE] FOSDEM 2024 - Fringe event - open source license and security compliance tooling workshop on Friday 2024-02-02
  • From: Philippe Ombredanne
• Re: Suggested user and developer actions
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Suggested user and developer actions
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Suggested user and developer actions
  • From: Benson Muite
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Eight-hour day edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Can I package linapple and ship it in Fedora?
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Can I package linapple and ship it in Fedora?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Can I package linapple and ship it in Fedora?
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Can I package linapple and ship it in Fedora?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Can I package linapple and ship it in Fedora?
  • From: Link Dupont
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Public Christmas Tree edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX migration: gmsh GPL exception
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPDX migration: gmsh GPL exception
  • From: Neal Gompa
• SPDX migration: gmsh GPL exception
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Freeze 'Em All edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: OpenSSL CRYPTOGAMS / golang-x-crypto license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• OpenSSL CRYPTOGAMS / golang-x-crypto license
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: License of test that tests SPDX ids?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Origin of Species edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License of test that tests SPDX ids?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• License of test that tests SPDX ids?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• valgrind devel headers license tag (bzip2-1.0.6?)
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: License of SPDX license list data itself
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: License of SPDX license list data itself
  • From: Richard Fontana
• License of SPDX license list data itself
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: EXIV2 BMFF Patents situation
  • From: Neal Gompa
• EXIV2 BMFF Patents situation
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Kristallnacht edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: How to handle GFDL/GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: How to handle GFDL/GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later
  • From: Petr Pisar
• How to handle GFDL/GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: python-dateutil SPDX license -- some code is Apache-2.0 and all code is BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: python-dateutil SPDX license -- some code is Apache-2.0 and all code is BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: CC0 license of dlmalloc in sgx-sdk package review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: CC0 license of dlmalloc in sgx-sdk package review
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Bob Mauchin
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Sandro
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Wichterle edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX license(s) for bundled dependencies
  • From: Neal Gompa
• SPDX license(s) for bundled dependencies
  • From: Zuzana Svetlikova
• Re: license of empty file
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: license of empty file
  • From: Richard Fontana
• license of empty file
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License for perl-Math-Random-ISAAC
  • From: Richard Fontana
• License for perl-Math-Random-ISAAC
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: License of sip
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: License of sip
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License of sip
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License of sip
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• License of sip
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: License of rpm-local-generator-support
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: License of rpm-local-generator-support
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License of rpm-local-generator-support
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: License of rpm-local-generator-support
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: python-dateutil SPDX license -- some code is Apache-2.0 and all code is BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: python-dateutil SPDX license -- some code is Apache-2.0 and all code is BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Richard Fontana
• License of rpm-local-generator-support
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: python-dateutil SPDX license -- some code is Apache-2.0 and all code is BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Petr Pisar
• python-dateutil SPDX license -- some code is Apache-2.0 and all code is BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)
  • From: Richard Hughes
• Re: SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)
  • From: Jerry James
• SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Miracle of the Sun edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• intel-media-driver-free waiting for legal review
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Munich Agreement edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Need help with x2godrive licensing.
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Need help with x2godrive licensing.
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Updates of licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Updates of licenses
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Updates of licenses
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Does the FPCA automatically relicense older unlicensed contributions if a Later Default License is added?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Does the FPCA automatically relicense older unlicensed contributions if a Later Default License is added?
  • From: Aaron Rainbolt
• Re: effective license
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: effective license (was: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: effective license (was: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: SPDX license when no GPL version is listed in source ?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• effective license (was: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX license when no GPL version is listed in source ?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• SPDX license when no GPL version is listed in source ?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Marco Polo edition
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Marco Polo edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: msv (xsdlib) licensing review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: CC0 license of dlmalloc in sgx-sdk package review
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: CC0 license of dlmalloc in sgx-sdk package review
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Simplification of package license expressions involving dual licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: CC0 license of dlmalloc in sgx-sdk package review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: CC0 license of dlmalloc in sgx-sdk package review
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Bundled Public Domain/CC0-1.0 blake2 library in Python
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Bundled Public Domain/CC0-1.0 blake2 library in Python
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Bundled Public Domain/CC0-1.0 blake2 library in Python
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Bundled Public Domain/CC0-1.0 blake2 library in Python
  • From: Petr Pisar
• CC0 license of dlmalloc in sgx-sdk package review
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Bundled Public Domain/CC0-1.0 blake2 library in Python
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Anarch's CC0 licence
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Anarch's CC0 licence
  • From: Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Is this still Boehm-GC?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Sandro
• Making no-conditions identifiers optional in the License: field
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Nonfree font(s) in 90-Second-Portraits (was: Effective license analysis: required or not?)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Nonfree font(s) in 90-Second-Portraits (was: Effective license analysis: required or not?)
  • From: Jeremy Newton
• Nonfree font(s) in 90-Second-Portraits (was: Effective license analysis: required or not?)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: RFC: PR to update exiv2 in Rawhide
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Is this still Boehm-GC?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is this still Boehm-GC?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is this still Boehm-GC?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Is this still Boehm-GC?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: RFC: PR to update exiv2 in Rawhide
  • From: Gary Buhrmaster
• Re: Is this still Boehm-GC?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Anne Mulhern
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Is this still Boehm-GC?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Effective license analysis: required or not?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Possibly problematic license terms: notify / notify-debouncer-mini Rust crates
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Support of modern file formats in exiv2
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Support of modern file formats in exiv2
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: License of perl-Data-UUID
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: msv (xsdlib) licensing review
  • From: Marián Konček
• Re: msv (xsdlib) licensing review
  • From: Marián Konček
• License of perl-Data-UUID
  • From: Jitka Plesnikova
• Re: msv (xsdlib) licensing review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: msv (xsdlib) licensing review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• msv (xsdlib) licensing review
  • From: Marián Konček
• Re: kickstart files and trademark licensing question on Ask Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: kickstart files and trademark licensing question on Ask Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: kickstart files and trademark licensing question on Ask Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Assessment of Fedora legal/license policies
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: relaxng-datatype license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: relaxng-datatype license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Flock edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: relaxng-datatype license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• relaxng-datatype license
  • From: Marián Konček
• Assessment of Fedora legal/license policies
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: kickstart files and trademark licensing question on Ask Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• kickstart files and trademark licensing question on Ask Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: SPDX identifier for the glibc startup code
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: SPDX identifier for the glibc startup code
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX identifier for the glibc startup code
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Proposal for '/usr/share/licenses/common-licenses/'
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Moon edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Possibly problematic license terms: notify / notify-debouncer-mini Rust crates
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Possibly problematic license terms: notify / notify-debouncer-mini Rust crates
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: cdecl's unclear copyright
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: cdecl's unclear copyright
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Possibly problematic license terms: notify / notify-debouncer-mini Rust crates
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• cdecl's unclear copyright
  • From: Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
• Re: License analysis for static linking
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: License analysis for static linking
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: License analysis for static linking
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: SPDX identifier for the glibc startup code
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: License analysis for static linking
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX identifier for the glibc startup code
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License analysis for static linking
  • From: Florian Weimer
• SPDX identifier for the glibc startup code
  • From: Florian Weimer
• License analysis for static linking
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Question regarding removal of copyrighted file from upstream sources
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Question regarding removal of copyrighted file from upstream sources
  • From: Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
• Re: License of cfitsio
  • From: Sergio Pascual
• Re: License of cfitsio
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License of cfitsio
  • From: Richard Fontana
• License of cfitsio
  • From: Sergio Pascual
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Dollar edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• License question on rewrites in different languages
  • From: h-k-81
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Berlin edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - DevConf edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Question regarding removal of copyrighted file from upstream sources
  • From: Sandro
• Re: Yuzu: A Nintendo Switch emulator - Legal questions
  • From: Steve Cossette
• Re: Yuzu: A Nintendo Switch emulator - Legal questions
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Yuzu: A Nintendo Switch emulator - Legal questions
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Yuzu: A Nintendo Switch emulator - Legal questions
  • From: Steve Cossette
• Re: licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Rust edition
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Rust edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• SPDX office hours Tuesday cancelled
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: perl-Crypt-Argon2: CC0-1.0 OR Apache-2.0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• perl-Crypt-Argon2: CC0-1.0 OR Apache-2.0
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - SPDX Hackfest edition
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - SPDX Hackfest edition
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - SPDX Hackfest edition
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - SPDX Hackfest edition
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - SPDX Hackfest edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Legal - SPDX Hackfest
  • From: dcantrell
• public domain dedication variants in the wild (found in Fedora)
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Victory day
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Changing the License tag of python-rpm-generators from GPLv2+ to a monstrosity
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Changing the License tag of python-rpm-generators from GPLv2+ to a monstrosity
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Changing the License tag of python-rpm-generators from GPLv2+ to a monstrosity
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• Changing the License tag of python-rpm-generators from GPLv2+ to a monstrosity
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: David Schwörer
• Re: "This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive"
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: "This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive"
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: "This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive"
  • From: Richard Fontana
• "This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive"
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: Justin W. Flory (he/him)
• Re: licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: David Schwörer
• Re: licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: Justin W. Flory (he/him)
• licensecheck output (MIT License)
  • From: David Schwörer
• Re: Permissibility of P-434 based elliptic curve in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Permissibility of P-434 based elliptic curve in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Permissibility of P-434 based elliptic curve in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Permissibility of P-434 based elliptic curve in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Requirements from upstream
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: [UPDATED] Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Request for adding licenses from Vim into allowed licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - ZX Spectrum edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fwd: Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs
  • From: David Cantrell
• Fwd: Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: how minor is this modification to the zlib license?
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• how minor is this modification to the zlib license?
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Easter edition
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Easter edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Easter edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Easter edition
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Easter edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Request for adding licenses from Vim into allowed licenses
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Re: CoPilot and Fedora packages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Request for adding licenses from Vim into allowed licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Request for adding licenses from Vim into allowed licenses
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Request for adding licenses from Vim into allowed licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: CoPilot and Fedora packages
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Request for adding licenses from Vim into allowed licenses
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Re: Do I merge "(A AND B) AND A" into "A AND B" or not?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Do I merge "(A AND B) AND A" into "A AND B" or not?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Do I merge "(A AND B) AND A" into "A AND B" or not?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Do I merge "(A AND B) AND A" into "A AND B" or not?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Package db-ip lite database
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Package db-ip lite database
  • From: Ingvar Hagelund
• Re: License for perlunicook.pod
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License for perlunicook.pod
  • From: Neal Gompa
• License for perlunicook.pod
  • From: Jitka Plesnikova
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - stilus annunciationis edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License for perl-MemHandle
  • From: Richard Fontana
• License for perl-MemHandle
  • From: Jitka Plesnikova
• Re: W3C Community Final Specification Agreement
  • From: Richard Fontana
• W3C Community Final Specification Agreement
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: CoPilot and Fedora packages
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: CoPilot and Fedora packages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: CoPilot and Fedora packages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Independence of Lithuania edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later
  • From: Petr Pisar
• License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later
  • From: Tomas Korbar
• Re: Metamail license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Metamail license
  • From: Jitka Plesnikova
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• CoPilot and Fedora packages
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Question about the text of a license file
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Question about the text of a license file
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Question about the text of a license file
  • From: h-k-81
• SPDX Office hours
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Update on SPDX license id adoption in Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Update on SPDX license id adoption in Fedora
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: What license for sgp4
  • From: Richard Fontana
• What license for sgp4
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: ASL 2.0 with 'CUPS' exception when packaging libcupsfilters (reviving old 'ASL 2.0 with exceptions' thread)
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Maxwell G
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: ASL 2.0 with 'CUPS' exception when packaging libcupsfilters (reviving old 'ASL 2.0 with exceptions' thread)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• ASL 2.0 with 'CUPS' exception when packaging libcupsfilters (reviving old 'ASL 2.0 with exceptions' thread)
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Re: Licenses without SPDX expression found in sane-frontends
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Re: Licenses without SPDX expression found in sane-frontends
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Licenses without SPDX expression found in sane-frontends
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Re: SPDX Statistics - Pavel edition
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Pavel edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• License change: snakemake 7.20.0 is MIT AND Unlicense
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Exception needed for KDE GitLab CI scripts being licensed CC0-1.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Exception needed for KDE GitLab CI scripts being licensed CC0-1.0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Exception needed for KDE GitLab CI scripts being licensed CC0-1.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Exception needed for KDE GitLab CI scripts being licensed CC0-1.0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Exception needed for KDE GitLab CI scripts being licensed CC0-1.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• SPDX office hours - Second Session
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Who wants to try matching these?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Here's another couple
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Who wants to try matching these?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Who wants to try matching these?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Here's another couple
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Here's another couple
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Who wants to try matching these?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Who wants to try matching these?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: T.C. Hollingsworth
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: xscreensaver and x11-ssh-askpass licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• SPDX Statistics - Malanka edition
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Office hours
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: SPDX Office hours
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPDX Office hours
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX Office hours
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: License updates: c4core, grpc, libfplll, python-graph-tool, python-mapbox-earcut
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• SPDX Office hours
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• License updates: c4core, grpc, libfplll, python-graph-tool, python-mapbox-earcut
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: rust-regex-syntax package license change: added Unicode-DFS-2016 license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Where are license files expected to reside?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: rust-regex-syntax package license change: added Unicode-DFS-2016 license
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Where are license files expected to reside?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Where are license files expected to reside?
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Where are license files expected to reside?
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: rust-regex-syntax package license change: added Unicode-DFS-2016 license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: xscreensaver and x11-ssh-askpass licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• xscreensaver and x11-ssh-askpass licenses
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Florian Weimer
• License compliance in fedora-review
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: rust-regex-syntax package license change: added Unicode-DFS-2016 license
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Neal Gompa