Fedora Legal - Date Index

• Thread Index

• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Maxwell G
• Guidelines for dealing with licensing issues in distributed packages
  • From: Florian Weimer
• rust-regex-syntax package license change: added Unicode-DFS-2016 license
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• What is this simple license called?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: What license should be used for package that contains "Redistributable, no modification permitted" binaries?
  • From: yunying . sun
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: What license should be used for package that contains "Redistributable, no modification permitted" binaries?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: What license should be used for package that contains "Redistributable, no modification permitted" binaries?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: What license should be used for package that contains "Redistributable, no modification permitted" binaries?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: What license should be used for package that contains "Redistributable, no modification permitted" binaries?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: What license should be used for package that contains "Redistributable, no modification permitted" binaries?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: What license should be used for package that contains "Redistributable, no modification permitted" binaries?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: How to handle CC0 in .NET 7 (dotnet7.0) ?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: How to handle CC0 in .NET 7 (dotnet7.0) ?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: How to handle CC0 in .NET 7 (dotnet7.0) ?
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: OCaml linking exception
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: OCaml linking exception
  • From: Neal Gompa
• OCaml linking exception
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Pamela Chestek
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Additional SPDX questions for .NET 7 (dotnet7.0)
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• How to handle CC0 in .NET 7 (dotnet7.0) ?
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Moolticute SPDX update
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Permissibility of P-434 based elliptic curve in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Patent question for moodycamel-readerwriterqueue package
  • From: Kriss Hiler
• Re: Package log4j 2.17.2 contains strangely-licensed files
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Package log4j 2.17.2 contains strangely-licensed files
  • From: Marián Konček
• Re: can we bundle CNN models for wechat_qrcode ?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Where are the OFL* licenses?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Where are the OFL* licenses?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Where are the OFL* licenses?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Where are the OFL* licenses?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Where are the OFL* licenses?
  • From: Jerry James
• License correction for libIDL-doc
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: can we bundle CNN models for wechat_qrcode ?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: can we bundle CNN models for wechat_qrcode ?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• can we bundle CNN models for wechat_qrcode ?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: SPDX progress
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: Package log4j 2.17.2 contains strangely-licensed files
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?
  • From: Kevin P. Fleming
• Package log4j 2.17.2 contains strangely-licensed files
  • From: Marián Konček
• Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Patent question for moodycamel-readerwriterqueue package
  • From: Sergey Mende
• Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Request to stop hobbling crypto libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Mesa patented codecs approval
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Mesa patented codecs approval
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Correction of libpri License field
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: SPDX progress
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: SPDX progress
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: SPDX progress
  • From: Bob Mauchin
• Re: SPDX progress
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX progress
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX progress
  • From: Maxwell G
• SPDX progress
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Correct link to spdx.org
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Correct link to spdx.org
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Updating old FSF address in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Updating old FSF address in license
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: license submissions to SPDX on behalf of Fedora
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: rpmlint and SPDX licenses: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: rpmlint and SPDX licenses: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: rpmlint and SPDX licenses: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: rpmlint and SPDX licenses: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: rpmlint and SPDX licenses: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: rpmlint and SPDX licenses: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Neal Gompa
• rpmlint and SPDX licenses: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: license submissions to SPDX on behalf of Fedora
  • From: Richard Fontana
• license submissions to SPDX on behalf of Fedora
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• ansible-collection-community-mysql License Change
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: More Ansible license changes
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Is ECDSA secp256k1 elliptic curve permitted to be packaged in Fedora?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• More Ansible license changes
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Is ECDSA secp256k1 elliptic curve permitted to be packaged in Fedora?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is ECDSA secp256k1 elliptic curve permitted to be packaged in Fedora?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Is ECDSA secp256k1 elliptic curve permitted to be packaged in Fedora?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Consider changing the license change announcement policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Consider changing the license change announcement policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Consider changing the license change announcement policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Consider changing the license change announcement policy
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Updating the Python license tag to SPDX and adjusting the license of Python documentation
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Updating the Python license tag to SPDX and adjusting the license of Python documentation
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Updating the Python license tag to SPDX and adjusting the license of Python documentation
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• python-ntlm-auth License Correction
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Modified Apache Software licenses
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Modified Apache Software licenses
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Updated IEEE license
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Updated IEEE license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Updated IEEE license
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Change in classification of CC0
  • From: Gary Buhrmaster
• Re: Change in classification of CC0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Change in classification of CC0
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Updating several packages to SPDX
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Updating several packages to SPDX
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Updating several packages to SPDX
  • From: Maxwell G
• Updating several packages to SPDX
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: API change and License change: python-ezdxf 0.18
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: API change and License change: python-ezdxf 0.18
  • From: Richard Fontana
• API change and License change: python-ezdxf 0.18
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Fedora adoption of SPDX ids and changes to packaging guidelines
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Good/bad dual licenses in Fedora packages
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Good/bad dual licenses in Fedora packages
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Lyes Saadi
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Lyes Saadi
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Change in classification of CC0
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Draft attempt to define Fedora license categories
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Change in classification of CC0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Change in classification of CC0
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Change in classification of CC0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Maxwell G
• other licensing guidance
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Fedora adoption of SPDX ids and changes to packaging guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Fedora adoption of SPDX ids and changes to packaging guidelines
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Draft attempt to define Fedora license categories
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPDX identifiers for xmag-1.0.7
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: SPDX identifiers for xmag-1.0.7
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• SPDX identifiers for xmag-1.0.7
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Updated IEEE license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Bob Mauchin
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: yq Licensing Question
  • From: Richard Fontana
• yq Licensing Question
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Is ECDSA secp256k1 elliptic curve permitted to be packaged in Fedora?
  • From: Robin H. Johnson
• Is ECDSA secp256k1 elliptic curve permitted to be packaged in Fedora?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Justin W. Flory (he/him)
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Justin W. Flory (he/him)
• License clarification: is CC-PDDC just "Public Domain"?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: LGPL-ish license in Package Review for sfexp
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: LGPL-ish license in Package Review for sfexp
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: LGPL-ish license in Package Review for sfexp
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: LGPL-ish license in Package Review for sfexp
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Publishing containers based on Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• LGPL-ish license in Package Review for sfexp
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Re: Publishing containers based on Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Publishing containers based on Fedora
  • From: Andreas Hartmann
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Justin W. Flory (he/him)
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: process for review of licenses
  • From: Richard Fontana
• process for review of licenses
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] license of the binary policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jason Tibbitts
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Publishing containers based on Fedora
  • From: Andreas Hartmann
• Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: SPDX Change proposal
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Updated IEEE license
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: SPDX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Change proposal
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Change proposal
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPX Change proposal
  • From: Florian Weimer
• SPX Change proposal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Gary Buhrmaster
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Third-party repositories
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Typo in FCPA FAQ
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Typo in FCPA FAQ
  • From: Jason Yundt
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Third-party repositories
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: T-vK T-vK
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: T-vK T-vK
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: T-vK T-vK
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: Scott Dowdle
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: T-vK T-vK
• Re: Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: Scott Dowdle
• Do I have to remove the Fedora logos when redistributing a modified version of a Fedora ISO?
  • From: T-vK T-vK
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• SPDX Change for F37?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Julian Sikorski
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: How to make a Pagure Pull Request and How it is licensed by default for contributors outside of 'packagers' group ?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: How to make a Pagure Pull Request and How it is licensed by default for contributors outside of 'packagers' group ?
  • From: Michal Schorm
• Re: How to make a Pagure Pull Request and How it is licensed by default for contributors outside of 'packagers' group ?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• How to make a Pagure Pull Request and How it is licensed by default for contributors outside of 'packagers' group ?
  • From: Michal Schorm
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Pamela Chestek
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: mininet license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• mininet license
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: GFDL invariant sections question
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: GFDL invariant sections question
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: GFDL invariant sections question
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: GFDL invariant sections question
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: GFDL invariant sections question
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Jerry James
• GFDL invariant sections question
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Neal Gompa
• good/bad v. approved/not-approved
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Justin Zobel
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Justin Zobel
• Re: Fedora's shortname -> SPDX
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Justin Zobel
• Re: Fedora's shortname -> SPDX
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• apache / patent / jbig2enc
  • From: Ingmar Lippert
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Waydroid LineageOS licensing
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fedora's shortname -> SPDX
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Fedora's shortname -> SPDX
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Waydroid LineageOS licensing
  • From: Alessandro Astone
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Justin Zobel
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Justin Zobel
• Re: Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Package Licensing - Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) License
  • From: Justin Zobel
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Serge Guelton
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Serge Guelton
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: LLVM Licensing
  • From: Florian Weimer
• LLVM Licensing
  • From: Serge Guelton
• Re: Draft attempt to define Fedora license categories
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Draft attempt to define Fedora license categories
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Draft attempt to define Fedora license categories
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Draft attempt to define Fedora license categories
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Draft attempt to define Fedora license categories
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: concerning who can change code licence
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: concerning who can change code licence
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: concerning who can change code licence
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• font licenses from Fedora submitted to SPDX License List
  • From: J Lovejoy
• Re: concerning who can change code licence
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: concerning who can change code licence
  • From: Michal Schorm
• concerning who can change code licence
  • From: Germano Massullo
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Lyes Saadi
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPDX identifiers
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPDX identifiers
  • From: Bryan Kearney
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Julian Sikorski
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Lyes Saadi
• Re: SPDX identifiers
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: FIGlet fonts
  • From: Lyes Saadi
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: SPDX identifiers
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: SPDX identifiers
  • From: Neal Gompa
• SPDX identifiers
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: List of packages with problematic license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Fedora license categories
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Fedora license categories
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: List of packages with problematic license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: List of packages with problematic license
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Fedora license categories
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: List of packages with problematic license
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fedora license categories
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: J Lovejoy
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Boolean logic in license
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Boolean logic in license
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: fedora-logos license
  • From: Neal Gompa
• fedora-logos license
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fedora license categories
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fedora license categories
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fedora license categories
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Christian Glombek
• Re: Approval of license exception for new Fedora packages: raft/dqlite
  • From: Reto Gantenbein
• Re: Approval of license exception for new Fedora packages: raft/dqlite
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Approval of license exception for new Fedora packages: raft/dqlite
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Re: Approval of license exception for new Fedora packages: raft/dqlite
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Approval of license exception for new Fedora packages: raft/dqlite
  • From: Reto Gantenbein
• Re: Bytepath packaging question
  • From: Dennis Payne
• Re: Bytepath packaging question
  • From: foss
• Bytepath packaging question
  • From: Dennis Payne
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Approval of license exception for new Fedora packages: raft/dqlite
  • From: Reto Gantenbein
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: ttyp0 font license
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: website blurb about licensing of iso downloads
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: website blurb about licensing of iso downloads
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: website blurb about licensing of iso downloads
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: website blurb about licensing of iso downloads
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: website blurb about licensing of iso downloads
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: website blurb about licensing of iso downloads
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• website blurb about licensing of iso downloads
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• ttyp0 font license
  • From: Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
• Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• FIGlet fonts
  • From: Lyes Saadi
• Qt package licenses
  • From: Jerry James
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Self Introduction: Jilayne Lovejoy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Yaakov Selkowitz
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• Re: License for NIST datasets
  • From: Davide Cavalca
• Re: License for NIST datasets
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Acceptability of a documentation license
  • From: Jeffrey H. Johnson
• Re: License for NIST datasets
  • From: Bryan Sutula
• Re: License for NIST datasets
  • From: Davide Cavalca
• Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: License for NIST datasets
  • From: Bryan Sutula
• License for NIST datasets
  • From: Davide Cavalca
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Josh Boyer
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Josh Boyer
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Richard Fontana
• [Fedora-legal-list] The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0
  • From: Jason Yundt
• Re: Steinberg VST3 License question
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Steinberg VST3 License question
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Steinberg VST3 License question
  • From: Pamela Chestek
• Steinberg VST3 License question
  • From: Pete Savage
• Re: Consider adding MVT License 1.0 to list of allowed/good licenses
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Consider adding MVT License 1.0 to list of allowed/good licenses
  • From: Christian Glombek
• Re: Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Unsplash License acceptable for Fedora Wallpaper Content?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Audacity is no longer free
  • From: Yaakov Selkowitz
• Re: Audacity is no longer free
  • From: Stuart D. Gathman
• Re: Audacity is no longer free
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Audacity is no longer free
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Audacity is no longer free
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Audacity is no longer free
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Audacity is no longer free
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: Is the coremark-pro Acceptable Use Agreement acceptable?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Is the coremark-pro Acceptable Use Agreement acceptable?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Is the coremark-pro Acceptable Use Agreement acceptable?
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Do we need to strip code with use restrictions from the tarball, or is deleting in %prep enough?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Do we need to strip code with use restrictions from the tarball, or is deleting in %prep enough?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Do we need to strip code with use restrictions from the tarball, or is deleting in %prep enough?
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Re: Do we need to strip code with use restrictions from the tarball, or is deleting in %prep enough?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Do we need to strip code with use restrictions from the tarball, or is deleting in %prep enough?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Curious maybe FOSS license that I can't identify
  • From: Jason Tibbitts
• Re: Curious maybe FOSS license that I can't identify
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Curious maybe FOSS license that I can't identify
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Curious maybe FOSS license that I can't identify
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Please add Minpack license to the list of Good Licenses
  • From: Jiri Kucera
• Re: Please add Minpack license to the list of Good Licenses
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: New font license in TeXLive 2021: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font License
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Please add Minpack license to the list of Good Licenses
  • From: Jiri Kucera
• New font license in TeXLive 2021: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font License
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: AppStream metainfo license in package license
  • From: Parag Nemade
• Re: AppStream metainfo license in package license
  • From: Ben Cotton
• AppStream metainfo license in package license
  • From: Parag Nemade
• Re: Are these Unicode Consortium files permissible content?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Are these Unicode Consortium files permissible content?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Proposed update of Fedora's default content license
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Proposed update of Fedora's default content license
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: BSD like license with strange wording?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: BSD like license with strange wording?
  • From: Timothée FLoure
• Re: BSD like license with strange wording?
  • From: Timothée FLoure
• Re: BSD like license with strange wording?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: BSD like license with strange wording?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• BSD like license with strange wording?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Python license link update
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Python license link update
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Python license link update
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Quick question about a BSD like license
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Quick question about a BSD like license
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: wdt package - Facebook SW patents granting
  • From: Richard Fontana
• wdt package - Facebook SW patents granting
  • From: Jaroslav Skarvada
• Adding rnnoise to the repo
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Unicode Terms of Use?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Unicode Terms of Use?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Steinberg VST3 SDK
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Steinberg VST3 SDK
  • From: Benjamin Beasley
• Re: AGPL exception question
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: AGPL exception question
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: AGPL exception question
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: AGPL exception question
  • From: Florian Weimer
• AGPL exception question
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Nmap Public Source License (NPSL) Version 0.92
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Nmap Public Source License (NPSL) Version 0.92
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Nmap Public Source License (NPSL) Version 0.92
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Nmap Public Source License (NPSL) Version 0.92
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Nmap Public Source License (NPSL) Version 0.92
  • From: Jason Tibbitts
• Nmap Public Source License (NPSL) Version 0.92
  • From: Ben Cotton
• coolreader: license change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+ and GUI from Qt4 to Qt5
  • From: Andy Mender
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: Olivier Lemasle
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
  • From: Olivier Lemasle
• Re: License for package scummvm
  • From: Christian Krause
• Re: License for package scummvm
  • From: Andy Mender
• Re: License for package scummvm
  • From: Ben Cotton
• License for package scummvm
  • From: Christian Krause
• Re: Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Brainpool Curves in Fedora (openssl, libgcrypt, gnupg)
  • From: Timothée Ravier
• Re: JPL NAIF/Spice toolkit license
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: JPL NAIF/Spice toolkit license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: JPL NAIF/Spice toolkit license
  • From: Pamela Chestek
• Re: JPL NAIF/Spice toolkit license
  • From: Richard Fontana
• JPL NAIF/Spice toolkit license
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Redistributable license for Copr
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Redistributable license for Copr
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Redistributable license for Copr
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Redistributable license for Copr
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Redistributable license for Copr
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Redistributable license for Copr
  • From: David Cantrell
• Redistributable license for Copr
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: The right license for logos and trademarks in a free software project
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: The right license for logos and trademarks in a free software project
  • From: Ben Cotton
• The right license for logos and trademarks in a free software project
  • From: Sheogorath
• Re: How to name the license in the spec
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: How to name the license in the spec
  • From: Jaroslav Skarvada