Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: license of the binary policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Oh, while we are on that topic, I will repeat what I think I've said
> before, that Fedora should consider adopting the Debian approach of
> having a /usr/share/common-licenses directory.

How would this differ from what we do currently, besides the obvious
name change from the current /usr/share/licenses directory?  Is it a
question of the directory layout, or something more basic like ignoring
the license text from upstream completely and just linking to it?

 - J<
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux