Hi Legal folks, Can you please consider removing the following rule? > Fedora package maintainers are expected to announce upstream license > changes that they become aware of on the Fedora devel list. -- https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/#_what_if_the_license_for_a_fedora_package_changes This creates unnecessary friction for packagers that simply wish to have correct License fields. I'm also not sure what purposes it serves. Richard explicitly said that Fedora does not concern itself with cross-package license compatibility. And even if it did, a "GPLv3+" to "GPL-3.0-or-later AND MIT" license change shouldn't cause any new license compatibility issues. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
