Hi all,
I'm in the progress of migrating the Mooltice [0] package to SPDX, but
it proved to be more difficult than anticipated. I would be grateful if
someone could review my current analysis.
The license tag and accompanying comment I have at the moment is the
following:
# The entire source code is GPL-3.0-or-later except:
# src/qwinoverlappedionotifier.[cpp|h] which is LGPL-3.0 OR
GPL-2.0-or-later,
# src/AnsiEscapeCodeHandler.[cpp|h] which is Qt-GPL-exception-1.0,
# src/CyoEncode/ which is BSD-2-Clause,
# src/QtAwesome/ which is MIT AND OFL-1.1 AND CC-BY-3.0 (see
src/QtAwesome/README.md for details),
# src/SimpleCrypt/ which is BSD-3-Clause,
# src/http-parser/ which is MIT,
# src/qtcsv/ which is MIT,
# src/qtcsv6/ which is MIT,
# src/utils/qurltlds_p.h which is MPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0-or-later OR
LGPL-2.1-or-later,
# src/zxcvbn-c which is BSD-3-Clause.
License: GPL-3.0-only AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND (LGPL-3.0 OR
GPL-2.0-or-later) AND BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND MIT AND OFL-1.1
AND CC-BY-3.0 AND (MPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0-or-later OR LGPL-2.1-or-later)
You can find the output of licensecheck here:
https://principis.fedorapeople.org/moolticute-0.55.18-testing-licensecheck.txt
. Note that src/QSimpleUpdater is removed as a patch.
Besides that I also couldn't find any reference to Qt-GPL-exception-1.0.
Is this license allowed?
[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/moolticute
Thank in advance!
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
