[Fedora-legal-list] Re: The FPCA’s “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” should be updated for CC BY-SA 4.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:01 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 8:45 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:38 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 7:51 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 7:05 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:10:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > > > On the topic of FPCA improvements, it would probably make sense (if
> > > > > > > the FPCA is retained) to replace the MIT license as the default code
> > > > > > > license with MIT No Attribution, aka MIT-0, recently approved by the
> > > > > > > OSI as an open source license:
> > > > > > > https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT-0
> > > > > > > (which would also enable a minor simplification of the FPCA text).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would personally prefer we didn't. That has the knock-on effect of
> > > > > > making it possible for RHEL folks to not include Fedora changelogs
> > > > > > when they fork Fedora for RHEL, since the RPM changelogs are the only
> > > > > > attribution we actually *have* in the distribution. And I've
> > > > > > personally experienced very positive reinforcement for contributing to
> > > > > > Fedora and CentOS Stream by pointing to public attribution via changelogs.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with Neal here as a deep gut reaction. Recognition is important,
> > > > > even if it is buried pretty deeply from endusers.
> > > > >
> > > > > That said, uh, we trim changelogs, so if we're arguing that that's the
> > > > > attribution part, we have some digging through git history to do to repair
> > > > > that.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Red Hat is going to have to fix *a lot* of the process around
> > > > Fedora->RHEL/CentOS if we're going to rely on Git history for
> > > > attribution. Especially if rpmautospec gets broader adoption. I was
> > > > personally pretty upset about how the c9s branches were forked from
> > > > Fedora Linux 34, where all the Fedora history was *gone*. I know that
> > > > it's still there in the internal RHEL Dist-Git, but the fact they
> > >
> > > You don't know that, and it's actually not there.
> > >
> > > This is what the import commits look like:
> > >
> > > commit eb6f429d3f0c2f41aa5bb7f8e5153668aa812553
> > > Author: XXXX XXXXXX <XXXXXX@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:   Fri Oct 23 08:45:59 2020 -0700
> > >
> > >     RHEL 9.0.0 bootstrap
> > >
> > >     The content of this branch was automatically imported from Fedora ELN
> > >     with the following as its source:
> > >     https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glibc#90ca20fd0234925743db5e1e231b73b4a38749a9
> > >
> > > then later
> > >
> > > commit df9ce2ff57e675edea493144401a1e1c9ed0f2b5
> > > Author: DistroBaker <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:   Tue Dec 15 10:59:21 2020 +0000
> > >
> > >     Merged update from upstream sources
> > >
> > >     This is an automated DistroBaker update from upstream sources.
> > >     If you do not know what this is about or would like to opt out,
> > >     contact the XXXX team.
> > >
> > >     Source: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glibc.git#525dee4c87180db08e1776a
> > > d3cb0e66a9b38e81f
> > >
> > >
> > > Please don't fall into the trap of believing your assumptions are reality :)
> > >
> >
> > That is insufficient. And when rpmautospec based packages start coming
> > to RHEL, it'll be *definitely* insufficient because none of that will
> > make it into the generated spec file and built packages.
>
> That's 3 years down the road.  Perhaps things can be improved between
> now and then.  Fortunately, work done against RHEL now via CentOS
> Stream will have attribution in the MRs, etc.
>

As long as you don't import any *new* packages during the EL9
lifecycle where this problem occurs, yes, it's 3 years down the road.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux