On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:06 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:19 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:09 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I don't know if it is better to fix this error or to instead look into > > > eliminating the FPCA requirement. The FPCA is now basically outdated > > > and has the detriment of being pointed to by certain CLA advocates as > > > proof that "Red Hat supports CLAs". > > > > > > > But, it's not a CLA? It's essentially project defaults for when new > > content is contributed to the project. AFAIK, that's how we avoid > > having to do what SUSE does (stuff license headers at the top of every > > spec file and other things). > > I agree, it's not a CLA. It's an un-CLA, as I've said more than once. :-) > But those project defaults could be established without having an > "agreement". See what CentOS does: > https://www.centos.org/legal/licensing-policy/ > CentOS has the disadvantage (up until this point) of being a place that nobody could really contribute meaningful code/packaging to. I suspect we probably need to revise CentOS to match Fedora with CentOS Stream 9 having a more direct contribution model. > On the topic of FPCA improvements, it would probably make sense (if > the FPCA is retained) to replace the MIT license as the default code > license with MIT No Attribution, aka MIT-0, recently approved by the > OSI as an open source license: > https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT-0 > (which would also enable a minor simplification of the FPCA text). > I would personally prefer we didn't. That has the knock-on effect of making it possible for RHEL folks to not include Fedora changelogs when they fork Fedora for RHEL, since the RPM changelogs are the only attribution we actually *have* in the distribution. And I've personally experienced very positive reinforcement for contributing to Fedora and CentOS Stream by pointing to public attribution via changelogs. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
