Hi Jilayne, On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 15:21 -0600, Jilayne Lovejoy wrote: > > > On 6/29/22 8:32 AM, Richard Fontana wrote: > > I would suggest: > > > > * Fedora should recognize CC-PDDC as a "good" license under the > > current system > MR done here > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/merge_requests/17 > > * The license tag for CC-PDDC would be CC-PDDC (not "Public > > Domain") > > * 1 and 2 would persist under the switch to SPDX identifiers > > * For this specific package, the license tag should be CC-PDDC (not > > "Public Domain"), but it is not clear that this is really what the > > upstream author(s) intended > > * Consider getting the upstream author to put the text of CC-PDDC > > in > > the LICENSE file > a couple people have already raised this here > https://gitlab.com/pwoolcoc/pwd/-/issues/1 > (which I just added to) > > Jilayne Thanks! Should we update the Fedora wiki as well then? It's still not showing CC-PDDC. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
