Hi Richard, Jilayne, Any opinion on the original question about CC-PDDC? It affects a new package review (rust-pwd). Thanks, Michel On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 01:29 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > My view - Fedora shouldn't at this point make classifications on > licenses in advance of their foreseeable inclusion in an actual > proposed or existing package in Fedora. (Historically, Fedora did > this, possibly even with respect to some of the Creative Commons > licenses.) > > Richard > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 6:30 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <jlovejoy@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > Hi Justin, > > > > Are you asking for the review of these b/c there is a package to be > > included in Fedora that uses these licenses? > > > > Thanks, > > Jilayne > > > > On 6/28/22 3:57 PM, Justin W. Flory (he/him) wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > Since Creative Commons licenses are already coming up, how is the > > Creative Commons IGO license family classified in Fedora? > > > > I didn't notice these licenses in the Licenses wiki page. They are > > distinctly different from other Creative Commons licenses and to > > the best of my knowledge, they are not superseded by the 4.0 family > > of Creative Commons licenses. I mention it here because if we are > > looking at other Creative Commons license families, it would be > > good to clarify how Fedora views the IGO family too. For context, > > some UN agencies are considering the IGO family of licenses as a > > default open source license for work created by public servants, so > > it isn't impossible to see CC IGO content working its way into > > Fedora at some point. > > > > The key distinction made in the IGO licenses from other CC licenses > > is around mediation and arbitration for resolving legal disputes. > > > > * https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ > > * https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/ > > * https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/ > > * https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/ > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Justin W. Flory (he/him) || 🔗 jwf.io > > TZ=America/New_York 🕖 > > > > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > On Tuesday, June 28th, 2022 at 15:49, Michel Alexandre Salim > > <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > During the review of rust-pwd (needed as a new dependency for rust- > > nu- > > path): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580 > > > > it came to light that the upstream Rust crate declares the license > > to > > be CC-PDDC: https://spdx.org/licenses/preview/CC-PDDC.html > > > > The change itself happened after the previous patch release (1.3.0) > > and > > is released in the latest 1.3.1: > > > > https://gitlab.com/pwoolcoc/pwd/-/commit/8375b41379c6f7b2a3b7a675d6b892b27faa44fd > > > > Two questions here: > > - can we treat CC-PDDC as basically Public Domain, which is > > approved by > > Fedora per > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses > > - if not, can we use the Git commit history to assume that the > > intent > > is to make this public domain? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Michel Alexandre Salim > > identities: > > https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 > > _______________________________________________ > > legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
