Qt package licenses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a copy of a message sent to fedora-devel-list 1 week ago, so
far with no reply.

I'm doing a review of a MinGW build of a Qt 6 package:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214

During the license check portion of the review, I have become
increasingly convinced that our qt5-* and qt6-* packages have
incorrect License fields.  Currently they have "LGPLv2 with exceptions
or GPLv3 with exceptions".  I believe that most or all of them should
have one of these two instead:

- LGPLv3 or GPLv2+
- LGPLv3 or GPLv2+ with exceptions

Would someone read through the comments on that bug and indicate
whether you think the analysis is correct or not, please?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux