Re: ttyp0 font license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:48:22PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> restricted calling a derivative work "dwarf" because Merriam-Webster
> says they're synonyms. But saying "you can't call it 'GNOME-ish'"
> would be acceptable because it uses the word "GNOME".

Ooh. I was with you right up until this example. To me, "GNOME-ish" means
"reminiscent of GNOME but not GNOME", which seems like the kind of thing
that _should_ be allowed. GNOME-erific or GNOME-improved or even GNOME-fork,
yeah, I see. But I'd hate to see open source licenses getting into "that
big foot-race that happens to be in capital of Massachusetts every year" or
"I guess we'll just all say Superb Owl" territory.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux