On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 1:00 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 10:29 AM Arthur Bols <arthur@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm in the progress of migrating the Mooltice [0] package to SPDX, but > > it proved to be more difficult than anticipated. I would be grateful if > > someone could review my current analysis. > > The license tag and accompanying comment I have at the moment is the > > following: > > > > # The entire source code is GPL-3.0-or-later except: > > # src/qwinoverlappedionotifier.[cpp|h] which is LGPL-3.0 OR > > GPL-2.0-or-later, > > <projects mountain bike signal onto clouds> > > Jilayne, these files actually say LGPLv3 (ambiguous as to later > versions but let's assume as a matter of common sense the Qt licensors > intended LGPLv3 only), or: > > ** Alternatively, this file may be used under the terms of the GNU > ** General Public License version 2.0 or (at your option) the GNU General > ** Public license version 3 or any later version approved by the KDE Free > ** Qt Foundation. > > That is not equivalent to GPL-2.0-or-later, if you assume it is > possible the KDE Free Qt Foundation might not approve the FSF's GPLv4, > say; how should this be represented as an SPDX expression? Should a > new GPL exception be submitted to SPDX? Is it even what SPDX would > classify as an "exception"? Does there need to be a 'Qt GPL' SPDX > identifier to cover this case, which I think is unique to Qt? Should > we just represent it as 'GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only'? (Surprised if > this hasn't come up before in an SPDX context.) > > > # src/AnsiEscapeCodeHandler.[cpp|h] which is Qt-GPL-exception-1.0, > > More precisely, GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0, I think. > > > # src/utils/qurltlds_p.h which is MPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0-or-later OR > > LGPL-2.1-or-later, > > Given the nature of this file, I'd just omit this. > There are KDE exception clauses in SPDX: LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL and LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-LGPL They have not been added to mainline SPDX, and I'm not sure why. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
