Re: Is the coremark-pro Acceptable Use Agreement acceptable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:47:16AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:09 PM Michel Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Most of it seems like standard trademark protection boilerplate, but
> > this section in particular seems concerning:
> >
> If it said "you can't put our marks on the output without a license",
> I think that would be fine. But since it forbids any use of the output
> without a license, it's not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora repos.
>
Ah, I was afraid that might be the case. If I were to add it to... one
of the third party repos, it would be in the non-free section,
presumably

Thanks,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux