Is the coremark-pro Acceptable Use Agreement acceptable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


We are looking at packaging coremark-pro, a benchmarking tool:
https://github.com/eembc/coremark-pro/

It's licensed under the Apache License 2.0, which is fine, but comes
with an Acceptable Use Agreement tied to the authors' trademarks:

https://github.com/eembc/coremark-pro/blob/main/LICENSE.md

Most of it seems like standard trademark protection boilerplate, but
this section in particular seems concerning:

4.1. Publication of Results. A "Commercial COREMARK-PRO License" from
EEMBC is required for Licensee to disclose, reference, or publish test
results generated by COREMARK-PRO in Licensee’s marketing of any of
Licensee’s commercially‐available, product‐related materials,
including, but not limited to product briefs, website, product
brochures, product datasheets, or any white paper or article made
available for public consumption.

Is this fine, or is this considered 'legally encumbered' per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items ?

Thanks,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux