Re: good/bad v. approved/not-approved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 03. 03. 22 v 23:48 Björn Persson napsal(a):
Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
Practically speaking, I think use of "approved" and
"not-approved" might end up being easier to understand.
"Not approved" can be understood as "not yet decided". You might get
requests to please evaluate and approve this or that not-approved
license.


Yep, same concern here.

Other than that, I also share Neals point, although this is the bigger concern to me.


Vít



I think "disapproved" would be clearer. Or "forbidden", "prohibited",
"rejected" or "disallowed".

Björn Persson

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux