On 31. 08. 22 13:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello license folks.
I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX:
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU
Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE already uses SPDX, so
rpmlint probably knows how to read that. Right?
rpmlint only knows what licenses we tell it, and the Fedora rpmlint
policy has not been updated yet because we want the
fedora-license-data package to produce the necessary TOML file that
rpmlint will source rather than me maintaining another copy of this.
rpmlint will handle both Fedora style and SPDX license tags once we
have that data file in place.
Great. Is this the file?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/blob/rawhide/f/licenses.toml
What's needed? Move this file to licenses-legacy.toml and install licenses.toml
from fedora-license-data? I can do that.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
