Re: SPDX Change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 11. 05. 22 v 19:24 Jilayne Lovejoy napsal(a):

Actually, @Mirek shouldn't the Phase 2 be "SPDX is mandatory for new packages from certain point in time" instead followed by Phase 3 with complete migration to SPDX?
Can be.  But I really hope that we will able to do everything during Phase 2. That is my plan. And the God is smiling when human do plans. :)

I was thinking that Phase 1 (the point at which SPDX ids are officially adopted and the various tasks noted in the Change proposal) would mean: SPDX ids are mandatory for new packages as of DATE.
Phase 2 would then be all about how to most efficiently get existing package spec files updated - which will be a longer phase.

+1

Miroslav

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux