Re: Caldera? license, OpenSolaris license?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:08 AM Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I wanted to test some shell compatibility features recently, and I came
> across the need to test ksh88 like shell.  I noticed there's heilroom-sh
> project [1, 2] that I'd like to package at least in Fedora Copr so I could
> easily test in the future.  Though there are two license files I'm afraid
> are not really mentioned neither in good/bad list of licenses (attached)
> so far.
>
> I believe they are good (BSD and CDDL modification), but I'd appreciate an
> explicit check, and perhaps fixing the Fedora licensing [3] wiki page.

Yes, one is a variant of the 4-clause BSD license (if Jilayne Lovejoy
is reading this, note that this would apparently not match SPDX
BSD-4-Clause as currently delineated) and the other is CDDL 1.0 with
an expected choice of law addendum.

Richard
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux