Am Montag, dem 25.10.2021 um 15:08 +0200 schrieb Pavel Raiskup: > I wanted to test some shell compatibility features recently, and I came > across the need to test ksh88 like shell. I noticed there's heilroom-sh > project [1, 2] that I'd like to package at least in Fedora Copr so I > could > easily test in the future. Though there are two license files I'm > afraid > are not really mentioned neither in good/bad list of licenses (attached) > so far. > > I believe they are good (BSD and CDDL modification), but I'd appreciate > an > explicit check, and perhaps fixing the Fedora licensing [3] wiki page. > > [1] http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh.html > [2] > https://sourceforge.net/projects/heirloom/files/heirloom-sh/050706/heirloom-sh-050706.tar.bz2/download#/heirloom-sh-050706.tar.bz2 > [3] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses Hi Pavel, both licenses are listed as "good" licenses according to the Fedora licensing wiki page [1]. The license tag of the package will be "CDDL-1.0 and BSD with advertising". The CDDL-1.0 requires that all resulting binaries or object files that are linked with object files licensed under the CDDL-1.0 terms and conditions can legally be relicensed to the CDDL-1.0 terms and conditions, which is in this case is permissible by the BSD license. Thanks, Björn [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
