Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I recently read a thread about someone asking about adding the
Monkey's Audio codec to openSUSE and it having an odd license[1], and
I was thinking of bringing this to Fedora as well.

However, the license[2] is confusing, and I'm not sure if it
necessarily qualifies under Fedora's definition of good open source
software[3].

If it is, what kind of license tag should be used, or should a new one
be made for it? I'm leaning toward a new license tag, given that the
terms look "special".

Thanks in advance and best regards,
Neal

[1]: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OR32LIUGQUZMXB6GQLUK62MD6VQTO2CR/
[2]: https://www.monkeysaudio.com/license.html
[3]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-approval/#_allowed_licenses

--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux