Re: Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/6/22 04:45, Neal Gompa wrote:
If it is, what kind of license tag should be used, or should a new one
be made for it? I'm leaning toward a new license tag, given that the
terms look "special".

It's definitely 'special', including the last bit about removing copies of the code from your storage device(s) if you don't agree with the terms.

From an armchair-laywer's point of view, the rest of the terms look like MIT/BSD-style licensing. Free for use for any purpose, must acknowledge the usage of the software, no warranties.

--
Kevin P. Fleming
He/Him/His
Principal Program Manager, RHEL
Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux