On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 12:30:16PM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > > license -- the MIT license -- but I don't see that much value in > > placing any emphasis on that. But if that is going to be referred to, > > it should be "the license of the Fedora distribution itself", not the > > more ambiguous "the license of the Fedora project itself". > > Or maybe "the license of the Fedora Linux distribution itself" (if I > recall correctly there's been some effort to refer to the distribution > as "Fedora Linux"). Yes please. I'm not going to fight colloquial usage, because that'd be silly, but for formal use like this, yes. It's the distro that's under the license, not ... all of us. :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
