License for package scummvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

during the update of the package scummvm I reviewed its license and stumbled over some difficulties:

- the main parts of the source code seem to be GPLv2+:
https://github.com/scummvm/scummvm/blob/branch-2-2/COPYING

- however, parts of scummvm are using a variety of BSD-like licenses as well as LGPLv2+, please see the various COPYING.* files here:
https://github.com/scummvm/scummvm/tree/branch-2-2

As far as I understand, these additional licenses are compatible with GPLv2+.

My concrete question is:

Is there a need to list the other licenses in the "License" tag as well or is "GPLv2+" sufficient? If all licenses need to be listed, would that be in this case:
"GPLv2+ and BSD and LGPLv2.1+ and OFL" ?

Note 1: It looks like that the TTF fonts under GPLv3+ (COPYING.FREEFONT) are not installed in Fedora (but they are present in the src package).

Note 2: The Suse distribution seems to use "GPL-2.0+" and Debian has references to all licenses: https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main
/s/scummvm/scummvm_2.2.0+dfsg1-1_copyright


Thank you very much in advance for the advice.


Best regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux