On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:19 PM J Lovejoy <opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The license inclusion guidelines for the SPDX License List can be found here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/master/DOCS/license-inclusion-principles.md - but as Richard already pointed out, usage in a major distro combined with the license meeting something like Fedora’s free/open criteria makes for a very strong candidate. In the case of the fedora-logos license, the license does not meet Fedora's free/open criteria. I'm not sure if the license can be seen as meeting the current criteria for content licenses or, as I would have thought, is understood to be exceptional because of the special nature of the package (see: "The one exception is that we permit content (but only content) which restricts modification as long as that is the only restriction." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses_3). Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
