Re: License for package scummvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:40 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:18 PM Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Is there a need to list the other licenses in the "License" tag as well or is "GPLv2+" sufficient? If all licenses need to be listed, would that be in this case:
> "GPLv2+ and BSD and LGPLv2.1+ and OFL" ?
>
Yes, you should record all of the relevant licenses as you listed.

Thank you very much for the clarification. Regarding the fonts I have to correct myself: the TTF fonts are part of the installed rpm package (in an archive called fonts.dat). So I will use the following license tag:

License:        GPLv2+ and LGPLv2.1+ and GPLv3+ and BSD and OFL

Best regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux