On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 6:15 PM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We have quite a few packages in Fedora that are released under some > version of the LGPL with what SPDX calls OCaml-LGPL-linking-exception. > That exception does not appear in the rpmlint-fedora-license-data > package. I'm looking at /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml, > at the bottom, in ValidLicenseExceptions. Indeed, when I tried to use > it, rpmlint complained: > > frama-c.x86_64: W: invalid-license-exception OCaml-LGPL-linking-exception > > Should I include this exception when converting OCaml package License > tags to SPDX format? > Please send a merge request to add it to fedora-license-data. While I'm not in control of the license data package, I would say go ahead and used the identifier, since it's an existing condition we've always accepted and it's already SPDX-recognized. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
