Re: OCaml linking exception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 6:15 PM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We have quite a few packages in Fedora that are released under some
> version of the LGPL with what SPDX calls OCaml-LGPL-linking-exception.
> That exception does not appear in the rpmlint-fedora-license-data
> package.  I'm looking at /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml,
> at the bottom, in ValidLicenseExceptions.  Indeed, when I tried to use
> it, rpmlint complained:
>
> frama-c.x86_64: W: invalid-license-exception OCaml-LGPL-linking-exception
>
> Should I include this exception when converting OCaml package License
> tags to SPDX format?
>

Please send a merge request to add it to fedora-license-data. While
I'm not in control of the license data package, I would say go ahead
and used the identifier, since it's an existing condition we've always
accepted and it's already SPDX-recognized.


--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux