On 23. 07. 22 22:24, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 4:04 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 23. 07. 22 3:36, Richard Fontana wrote:
Feel free to ask any questions or make any comments about this!
Hey Richard,
if I maintain a small piece of software upstream that was licensed as CC0, what
are Fedora's recommendation for an alternative? 0BSD?
I don't know if Fedora has an opinion on this but in a Red Hat
context, years ago I used to recommend CC0 for certain kinds of
things. These days in similar situations (Involving code, at least) I
have typically been recommending MIT No Attribution (SPDX: MIT-0)
https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT-0
As the name suggests, it's the MIT license but with the notice
preservation requirement removed. Very similar conceptually to
Zero-Clause BSD (SPDX: 0BSD), which I would be less inclined to
recommend primarily because I don't like the name, since it's actually
based on the ISC license. :-)
Thanks.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
