On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 4:04 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 23. 07. 22 3:36, Richard Fontana wrote: > > Feel free to ask any questions or make any comments about this! > > Hey Richard, > > if I maintain a small piece of software upstream that was licensed as CC0, what > are Fedora's recommendation for an alternative? 0BSD? I don't know if Fedora has an opinion on this but in a Red Hat context, years ago I used to recommend CC0 for certain kinds of things. These days in similar situations (Involving code, at least) I have typically been recommending MIT No Attribution (SPDX: MIT-0) https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT-0 As the name suggests, it's the MIT license but with the notice preservation requirement removed. Very similar conceptually to Zero-Clause BSD (SPDX: 0BSD), which I would be less inclined to recommend primarily because I don't like the name, since it's actually based on the ISC license. :-) Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
